original post from july 25
Yesterday, we conducted extensive testing on the Edelrid Ohmega!
We compared it directly with all other devices available on the market: the Zaed, Bauer Zorro, Bauer Espressi Light, and Bauer Espressi Basic.
Since it is technically outdated, I spared us any unpleasant falls into the OHM; I also excluded the first Bauer model, as we already had three more current Bauer variants represented in the test field.
Our Initial Conclusion After Several "Flight Hours"
Our comprehensive fall tests show that all devices function reliably. However, we would like to particularly highlight the Edelrid Ohmega. I was initially skeptical about what this small device could really achieve, but I am absolutely positively surprised by Edelrid’s successful development!
Watch the Tests on YouTube!
For those who don't want to rely blindly on our written word, you can watch the falls and our conclusion on our YouTube channel, "Ape Climbing." We show the entire testing process transparently in a "making-of" video. Additionally, there is a separate conclusion video featuring the most important fall scenes—hopefully presented in a compact and informative way.
The videos are currently in post-production, and I will report back once they are ready to watch. Until then, hats off to Edelrid; in the future, all friction enhancers—or "belay assistants," as Edelrid calls this category of devices—will have to measure up to the Ohmega!
update august 25
In contrast to most commercial "reviews," I have been testing climbing equipment for many years out of academic interest. I do this because I know how much nonsense is sometimes spread in the climbing world.
A good example is the Trango Cinch. This device, which had such a bad reputation in the climbing scene, received an update a few years ago and has been called the Vergo ever since. At its core, it is still a Cinch, yet suddenly there is no more fuss about it. Many climbers have little clue and simply parrot what they hear or see somewhere. I bought a Cinch back then and conducted my own tests. It is a great device, especially for toprope soloing, and I am always happy whenever I still find one somewhere.
What I mean to say is this:
The first test of the Ohmega with a specific rope was, of course, just one of many tests I regularly perform. I cannot set up a camera and spend an entire day on video editing every single time. Therefore, I will post updates regarding my initial impressions here in the forum, such as with a well-used 10 mm rope.
Yesterday, we tested all devices again, this time with a thicker 10 mm rope. The ZAED in particular behaved completely differently: while it showed hardly any significant braking effect even on level 3 with a new 9.6 mm rope, soft belaying was no longer possible at all with the 10 mm rope on level 3! This shows how extremely important the type and condition of the rope are. The ZAED can, therefore, brake very well if the rope is appropriately suited. (A direct fall into the ZAED is 1:1 the same as a fall into a quickdraw).
The Bauer devices worked perfectly as usual. While the old Zorro (officially 2021, though I have owned it since April 2020) was somewhat unpleasant when pulling rope with the 10 mm line, the Espressi Light now works absolutely well. But here, too, it must be noted that the friction of the Bauer devices depends heavily on the condition of the rope, and both diameter and surface texture influence the braking effect.
We will definitely continue to take falls and experiment, and we will share our impressions here in the forum.